"Electronic eyes" into the legal system installation monitoring needs to be careful

The important value of surveillance system for public security is self-evident, but the supervision on the installation of surveillance cameras is worrying. It not only maintains public security, but also has inevitable conflicts with the protection of citizens' privacy. In this case, it is more necessary for relevant departments to formulate relevant laws and regulations, bring the "electronic eye" into the legal supervision system as soon as possible, make detailed provisions for the installation location and method of the camera, and truly "positive" application of the camera.

With the improvement of security awareness, nowadays, many residential areas are installed with cameras, but some cameras have become "blind", empty decoration, and ultimately hurt innocent citizens. But then again, are more cameras necessarily a good thing, and how can citizens' privacy be maintained? How can you bring the positive effects of a camera to *?

Take the security surveillance cameras in the community, perhaps they are usually seen as some humble "decoration", but when residents in the community are harmed by personal or property, the camera can provide important clues to solve the case and protect the interests of residents. Like the weifang Shengrong Square mentioned in the report, 102 cameras exist in the main road of each building, each main road, each entrance and exit of the community. Although usually the owners come to adjust the video is mostly for small things, but it is enough to see that the appropriate installation of "electronic eyes" in the community has played a positive role in the residents. At least they can give those who do not know it to play a sense of deterrence, the time of petty theft in the community will naturally decrease accordingly.

Cameras, of course, is "dead", the person is alive, there are a lot of people will concern, both residential and other public places, most of the surveillance camera Angle can be manipulated, and the implementation of security monitoring staff, who will monitor their will certainly put the camera at the public channel, or a parking space, rather than on the residents' bedroom window or somewhere else?

In fact, such concerns are not unreasonable. Recently, some "hot" videos have been frequently exposed on the Internet. Although some of the behaviors of the protagonists of the videos go too far, they do not violate the law or moral bottom line after all. However, the operators of "electronic Eye" secretly release the videos for various reasons, violating the rights and interests of the parties involved. Who gave them the right to pry into other people's privacy? Who has the right to leak surveillance videos at will, or even upload them to the Internet for thousands of people to read and download?

With the development of society, "electronic eyes" undoubtedly play an important role in maintaining social security and improving people's sense of security, but the contradictions caused by it are also escalating. "Electronic eye" camera as a natural "double-edged sword", on the one hand to maintain the responsibility of public security, on the other hand must always be vigilant not to infringe on the privacy of citizens. Thus, the camera not only to install, but also to install "art", installed "in accordance with the rules".